Global Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market by Product (Internal Trauma Fixation Plates, Screws, Rod Wires & Pins, Fusion Nails) & by End-Users (Hospital, Orthopedic Clinics) - Analysis and Forecast to 2019

The report analyzes the global internal fixation devices market by product, end user, and geography. This market is estimated to grow at a CAGR of 6.7% from 2014 to 2019. Trauma is a condition caused by various strains or physical injuries such as dislocation, fractures, or burns due to external sources. Among the various procedures used by surgeons, a fixation device is one of the most vital treatment methods used to treat trauma.

The report provides an in-depth analysis of the internal fixation devices market landscape and market trends on the internal trauma fixation devices market, by product (plates, screws, rods, and wires and pins) and by end user (hospitals, point-of-care testing, and other end users (ambulatory care units, emergency units, and trauma centers). Increasing number of road accidents, innovation in implant technologies and increasing adoption of supporting technologies is the major growth factor driving the internal trauma fixation devices market.

Prominent players involved in the development of new products in the internal fixation devices market are responsible for the growth of this market. For instance, in February 2015, Biomet launched a new product—G7 OSSEOTI POROUS ACETABULAR SHELL—which received regulatory clearance for clinical use in total hip arthroplasty. This product will be used in conjugation with G7 Acetabular System, which is a platform designed to deliver simplicity, efficiency, and performance for primary and revision hip arthroplasty. Moreover, the addition of OsseoTi Porous Technology to the G7 Acetabular System expanded Biomet’s well established portfolio of total hip constructs.

In 2014, North America commanded the largest share of 51.4% of the North American internal trauma fixation devices market, followed by Europe.

In-depth Market share analysis, by revenue, of the top companies is also included in the report. These numbers are arrived at based on key facts, annual financial information from SEC filings, annual reports, and interviews with industry experts and key opinion leaders such as CEOs, directors, and marketing executives. Detailed market share analysis of the major players in global internal trauma fixation devices market is covered in this report.

Major companies in this market Stryker Corporation (U.S.), DePuy Synthes (a Johnson & Johnson Company) (U.S.), Zimmer Holdings, Inc. (U.S.), Smith & Nephew plc (U.K.), Tornier, Inc. (France) and Biomet, Inc. (U.S.).

Table of Contents

1 Introduction (Page No. - 12)
    1.1 Objectives of the Study
    1.2 Market Segmentation & Coverage
    1.3 Stakeholders

2 Research Methodology (Page No. - 14)
    2.1 Integrated Ecosystem of Internal Fixation Devices Market
    2.2 Arriving at the Internal Fixation Devices Market Size
           2.2.1 Top-Down Approach
           2.2.2 Demand-Side Approach
           2.2.3 Macroindicator-Based Approach
    2.3 Assumptions

3 Executive Summary (Page No. - 22)

4 Market Overview (Page No. - 24)
    4.1 Introduction
    4.2 Internal Fixation Devices Market: Comparison With Parent Market (Trauma Fixation Devices Market)
    4.3 Market Drivers and Inhibitors
    4.4 Key Market Dynamics

5 Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market, By Product (Page No. - 29)
    5.1 Introduction
    5.2 Global Internal Fixation Devices, By Product
    5.3 Global Internal Fixation Devices Market, Product Comparison With Trauma Fixation Devices Market
           5.3.1 Internal Trauma Fixation Plates
           5.3.2 Internal Trauma Fixation Screws
           5.3.3 Internal Trauma Fixation Rods
           5.3.4 Internal Trauma Fixation Wires & Pins
           5.3.5 Internal Trauma Fixation Fusion Nails

6 Global Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market, By End User (Page No. - 38)
    6.1 Introduction
    6.2 Global Internal Fixation Devices Market in Hospitals, By End User
    6.3 Global Internal Fixation Devices Market in Orthopedic Clinics, By End User
    6.4 Global Internal Fixation Devices Market in Other End Users, By End User

7 Global Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market, By Geography (Page No. - 43)
    7.1 Introduction
    7.2 North American Internal Fixation Devices Market
           7.2.1 North America: Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market, By Product
           7.2.2 North America: Internal trauma Fixation Devices Market, By End User
    7.3 European Internal Fixation Devices Market
           7.3.1 Europe: Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market, By Product
           7.3.2 Europe: Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market, By End User
    7.4 Asia-Pacific Internal Fixation Devices Market
           7.4.1 Asia-Pacific: Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market, By Product
           7.4.2 Asia-Pacific: Trauma Fixation Devices Market, By End User
    7.5 Rest of the World (RoW) Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market
           7.5.1 Rest of the World (RoW): Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market, By Product
           7.5.2 Rest of the World (RoW): Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market, By End User

8 Global Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market: Competitive Landscape (Page No. - 60)
    8.1 Internal Fixation Devices Market: Company Share Analysis
    8.2 Mergers & Acquisitions
    8.3 New Product Launches
    8.4 Agreements
    8.5 Expansions
    8.6 Announcements
    8.7 Patents

9 Global Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market, By Company (Page No. - 66)
(Overview, Financials, ProduCTS & Services, Strategy, and Developments)*
    9.1 Biomet, Inc.
    9.2 Depuy Synthes Companies of Johnson & Johnson
    9.3 Smith & Nephew Plc
    9.4 Stryker Corporation
    9.5 Zimmer Holdings Inc.
    9.6 Tornier, Inc.
    9.7 Aesculap AG (B. Braun Melsungen AG)
    9.8 Waldemar Link Gmbh & Co. Kg
    9.9 Mathys AG
    9.10 Japan Medical Dynamic Marketing, Inc.
*Details on Overview, Financials, Product & Services, Strategy, and Developments Might Not be Captured in Case of Unlisted Company

10 Appendix (Page No. - 100)
     10.1 Customization Options
             10.1.1 Product Analysis:
             10.1.2 Epidemiology Data:
             10.1.3 Procedure Volume Data:
             10.1.4 Surgeons/Physicians Perception Analysis:
             10.1.5 Regulatory Framework
             10.1.6 Alternative ProduCTS: Impact Analysis
     10.2 Related Reports
     10.3 Introducing RT: Real-Time Market Intelligence
             10.3.1 RT Snapshots

List of Tables (43 Tables)

Table 1 Global Internal Fixation Devices vs Peer Market Size, 2014 (USD MN)
Table 2 Number of Road Accidents, 2014 (Absolute)
Table 3 Number of People Above 65 Years, 2014 (Mn)
Table 4 Global Internal Fixation Devices Market: Macroindicators, By Country, 2014 (USD MN)
Table 5 Global Internal Fixation Devices Market: Comparison With Parent Market (Trauma Fixation Devices Market), 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Table 6 Global Trauma Fixation Devices Market: Drivers and Inhibitors
Table 7 Global Internal Fixation Devices Market, By Product, 2013 - 2019 (USD MN)
Table 8 Global Internal Fixation Devices Market, By Geography, 2013 - 2019 (USD MN)
Table 9 Global Internal Fixation Devices Market, By Product, 2013 - 2019 (USD MN)
Table 10 Global Internal Fixation Devices Market: Type Comparison With Parent Market (Trauma Fixation Devices Market), 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Table 11 Internal Trauma Fixation Plates Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Table 12 Internal Trauma Fixation Screws Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Table 13 Internal Trauma Fixation Rods Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Table 14 Internal Trauma Fixation Wires & Pins Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Table 15 Internal Trauma Fixation Fusion Nails Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Table 16 Global Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market in Hospitals, By Geography, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Table 17 Global Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market in Orthopedic Clinics, By Geography, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Table 18 Global Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market in Other End Users, By Geography, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Table 19 Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Table 20 North America: Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market, By Product, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Table 21 North America: Trauma Fixation Devices Market, By End User, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Table 22 Europe: Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market, By Product, 2013 2019 (USD MN)
Table 23 Europe: Trauma Fixation Devices Market, By End User, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Table 24 Asia-Pacific: Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market, By Product, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Table 25 Asia-Pacific: Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market, By End User, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Table 26 Rest of the World (RoW): Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market, By Product, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Table 27 Rest of the World (RoW): Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market, By End User, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Table 28 Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market: Company Share Analysis, 2013 (%)
Table 29 Global Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market: Mergers & Acquisitions
Table 30 Global Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market: New Product Launches
Table 31 Global Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market: Agreements
Table 32 Global Internaltrauma Fixation Devices Market: Expansions
Table 33 Global Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market: Announcements
Table 34 Global Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market: Patents
Table 35 Biomet, Inc.: Key Financials, 2011 – 2013 (USD MN)
Table 36 Depuy Synthes Companies of Johnson & Johnson: Key Financials, 2011 – 2013 (USD MN)
Table 37 Smith & Nephew Plc.: Key Financials, 2009 – 2013 (USD MN)
Table 38 Stryker Corporation: Key Financials, 2009 – 2013 (USD MN)
Table 39 Zimmer Holdings Inc.: Key Financials, 2009 – 2013 (USD MN)
Table 40 Tornier, Inc.: Key Financials, 2009 – 2013 (USD MN)
Table 41 B.Braun Melsungen AG: Key Financials, 2009 – 2013 (USD MN)
Table 42 Japan Medical Dynamic Marketing, Inc.: Key Financials, 2012 – 2014 (USD MN)
Table 43 Japan Medical Dynamic Marketing, Inc.: Key Operations Data, 2012 – 2013 (USD MN)

List of Figures (51 Figures)

Figure 1 Global Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market: Segmentation & Coverage
Figure 2 Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market: Integrated Ecosystem
Figure 3 Research Methodology
Figure 4 Top-Down Approach
Figure 5 Demand-Side Approach: Number of Road Accidents
Figure 6 Demand-Side Approach: Aging Population
Figure 7 Macroindicator-Based Approach
Figure 8 Global Internal Trauma Devices Market Snapshot
Figure 9 Global Internal Trauma Fixation Devices: Comparison With Parent Market (Trauma Fixation Devices Market)
Figure 10 Geographic Overview: Global Internal Trauma Devices Market, By Product, 2014 (USD MN)
Figure 11 Global Internal Trauma Devices Market, By Product, 2014 vs. 2019 (USD MN)
Figure 12 Global Internal Trauma Devices Market: Product Comparison With Trauma Fixation Devices Market, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Figure 13 Internal Trauma Fixation Plates Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Figure 14 Internal Trauma Fixation Screws Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Figure 15 Internal Trauma Fixation Rods Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Figure 16 Internal Trauma Fixation Wires & Pins Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Figure 17 Internal Trauma Fixation Fusion Nails Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Figure 18 Global Internal Trauma Devices Market in Hospitals, By End User, By Geography, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Figure 19 Global Internal Trauma Devices Market in Orthopedic Clinics, By End User, By Geography, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Figure 20 Global Internal Trauma Devices Market in Other End Users, By End User, By Geography, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Figure 21 Internal Trauma Devices Market: Growth Analysis, By Geography, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Figure 22 North America: Internal Trauma Devices Market Overview, 2014 & 2019 (%)
Figure 23 North America: Internal Trauma Devices Market, By Product, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Figure 24 North America: Internal Trauma Devices Market, By Product, 2014 & 2019 (%)
Figure 25 North America: Internal Trauma Devices Market: End-User Snapshot, 2014 & 2019
Figure 26 North America: Internal Trauma Devices Market, By End User, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Figure 27 Europe: Internal Trauma Devices Market Overview, 2014 & 2019 (%)
Figure 28 Europe: Internal Trauma Devices Market, By Product, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Figure 29 Europe: Internal Trauma Devices Market, By Product, 2014 & 2019 (%)
Figure 30 Europe: Internal Trauma Devices Market: End-User Snapshot, 2014 & 2019
Figure 31 Europe: Internal Trauma Devices Market, By End User, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Figure 32 Asia-Pacific: Internal Trauma Devices Market Overview, 2014 & 2019 (%)
Figure 33 Asia-Pacific: Internal Trauma Devices Market, By Product, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Figure 34 Asia-Pacific: Internal Trauma Devices Market, By Product, 2014 &2019 (%)
Figure 35 Asia-Pacific: Trauma Fixation Devices Market: End-User Snapshot
Figure 36 Asia-Pacific: Internal Trauma Devices Market, By End User, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Figure 37 Rest of the World (RoW): Internal Trauma Devices Market Overview, 2014 & 2019 (%)
Figure 38 Rest of the World (RoW): Internal Trauma Devices Market, By Product, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Figure 39 Rest of the World (RoW): Internal Trauma Devices Market, By Product, 2014 & 2019 (%)
Figure 40 Rest of the World (RoW) Internal Trauma Devices Market: End-User Snapshot, 2014 & 2019
Figure 41 Rest of the World (RoW): Internal Trauma Fixation Devices Market, By End User, 2013 – 2019 (USD MN)
Figure 42 Internal Trauam Fixation Devices Market: Company Share Analysis, 2013 (%)
Figure 43 Biomet, Inc.: Revenue Mix, 2013 (%)
Figure 44 Depuy Synthes Companies of Johnson & Johnson: Revenue Mix, 2013 (%)
Figure 45 Smith & Nephew Plc: Revenue Mix, 2013 (%)
Figure 46 Stryker Corporation: Revenue Mix, 2013 (%)
Figure 47 Zimmer Holdings Inc.: Revenue Mix, 2013 (%)
Figure 48 Tornier, Inc.: Revenue Mix 2013 (%)
Figure 49 B.Braun Melsungen AG: Reveue Mix, 2013 (%)
Figure 50 Contribution of Aesculap AG Towards B. Braun’s Revenues, 2009 – 2013 (USD MN)
Figure 51 Japan Medical Dynamic Marketing Inc.: Reveue Mix, 2014 (%)

This report covers the definition, description, and forecast of the global internal trauma fixation devices market. It involves a detailed analysis of the market segmentation, wherein the criteria for segmentation include products, end users, and geographies. The report also provides a strategic analysis of the key players in this market. In terms of geography, the market has been segmented into North America, Europe, Asia, and the Rest of the World (RoW).

Increasing incidence of osteoporosis and accidental bone fracture is the major driver for the internal trauma fixation devices market globally, and future growth is expected to be robust owing to the increasing incidences of osteoporosis.

This report also provides critical insights into the emerging trends that will fuel product adoption and market growth for plates, screws, rods, wires and pins, and fusion nails during the forecast period. Internal trauma fixation device manufacturers are increasingly focusing on developing products that are suited for specific anatomical locations. For example, low-profile plating systems have grown in popularity for extremity fixation procedures, where soft tissue coverage is minimal and thicker systems often cause irritation. Polyaxial plating systems are also gaining popularity in the market as these systems improve screw placement, a particularly important feature when a surgeon is securing small-bone fragments near periarticular surfaces. Market growth will also continue to be fueled by surgeons’ preference for anatomic plating systems. These devices are designed to fit the unique contours of periarticular surfaces, allowing for improved screw placement around small bone fragments to achieve adequate fracture reduction. Since surgeons primarily focus on attaining the most secure fixation possible, significant market opportunities exist for companies that introduce advanced or specialized trauma fixation technologies.

The global internal trauma fixation devices market is expected to reach $8,396.5 million by 2019, growing at a CAGR of 6.7% from 2014 to 2019. Market growth can mainly be attributed to the increasing adoption of internal fixation devices; this trend is expected to continue for the next four to five years. The internal fixation devices market is expected to reach $7,418.4 million by 2019, at a CAGR of 6.9% from 2014 to 2019. This is mainly due to the increasing incidences of spinal deformities (such as disc compression) among the aging population in the North American region, and the popularity of non-fusion devices such as artificial spinal discs. The increasing demand from the aging population, along with advancements in medical technologies (minimally invasive techniques and biologics), is driving the demand for the trauma fixation devices market in this region.

Major players in the global internal trauma fixation devices market include Stryker Corporation (U.S.), DePuy Synthes (a Johnson & Johnson Company) (U.S.), Zimmer Holdings, Inc. (U.S.), Smith & Nephew plc (U.K.), Tornier, Inc. (France), and Biomet, Inc. (U.S.).